🔗 Share this article

In a first-of-its-kind legal move, San Francisco is set to file what is being called the nation's first government lawsuit targeting major food manufacturers over ultra-processed foods. The city contends that local governments have been absorbing the significant costs of treating diseases linked to the broad public intake of these manufactured goods.

The Primary Allegation of the Case

The city's filing, to be presented in superior court, targets ten industry giants responsible for creating some of the America's favorite food and beverage items. This roster reportedly includes everything from chicken nuggets and pre-made pizzas to crisps and sugary breakfast cereals. Notably, the action also includes products like certain breads and snack bars that are often advertised as "wholesome" options.

The legal complaint accuses these companies of carrying out "deceptive business practices" in their promotion and distribution. It argues that these tactics breach state laws regarding deceptive trade and community harm. A fundamental allegation is that the corporations knew their products could make people sick but continued marketing them.

"It is deeply troubling that families for years are being duped and buying food that's not food," said the city's top legal official.

Examining UPFs

UPFs are formulated using complex procedures and contain additives not typically found in a home kitchen. These encompass chemical preservatives, flavor enhancers, synthetic dyes, and emulsifiers, with virtually zero unprocessed food content.

Studies indicates that a dominant majority of the U.S. food supply is made up of foods typically classified as ultra-processed. Alarmingly, young people are estimated to get the majority of their daily calories from these products.

The Established Health Risks

A comprehensive global scientific review, released recently, found that intake of these products is connected to harm in all vital bodily systems of the human body. The review tied these foods with an higher likelihood of a numerous major illnesses, encompassing:

• Cancer
• Excessive weight gain
• Adult-onset diabetes
• Mental health struggles
• Cardiovascular illness
• Cognitive decline

The authors of that review concluded that the explosion of UPFs is being driven by global corporations, not personal consumer decisions. They described UPFs as a major contributor of a global "chronic disease pandemic" linked to diet, with corporations putting profit first ahead of safety.

Partisan Alignment on a Uncommon Subject

This lawsuit represents a atypical point of agreement between the politically progressive city of San Francisco and the national leadership. The nation's top health official has railed against ultra-processed foods, urging Americans to limit their consumption on products with excess sugar, salt, fat, artificial colors, and preservatives as part of a "national wellness" mission.

The city attorney noted that while he disagrees with the administration on many other health topics, the evidence on ultra-processed foods is "clear-cut." He commented, "A number of the positions of this administration are lacking evidence, but this is distinct. Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

Named Defendants and Past Actions

The corporations listed in the lawsuit reportedly include industry titans such as:

• The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo
• Kraft Heinz Company
• General Mills and Kellogg
• Nestlé USA and Mondelez International
• Post Holdings, Mars Incorporated, and ConAgra Brands

This move is informed by other regulatory steps in California. Earlier this year, the state passed a cross-party legislation that became the first in the U.S. to legally define of ultra-processed foods, laying a foundation for removing them from schools. The state has also banned certain chemicals, including food dyes linked to behavioral difficulties in children, within school meals.

The city attorney's office has previously succeeded in winning cases against large corporations on health-related issues, including actions against cigarette manufacturers, lead paint manufacturers, and opioid manufacturers.

The lawsuit will seek monetary restitution for the costs that local governments shoulder for caring for citizens whose conditions have been exacerbated by the long-term consumption of ultra-processed food.